ذیلاً بخشی از سخنرانی جناب آقای دکتر علی محمدی پور با عنوان " Analyze of intelligence (IQ, EQ or SQ) and classify different personalities " که محور اصلی سخنرانی ایشان در قالب ارائه تعاریف پایه ای IQ، EQ، SQ و مولفه های اساسی آنها، به همراه تفکیک الگوهای شخصی متنوع در قالب نظریات تئوریکی مربوطه و قابل کلاسه بندی میباشد. همچنین تحلیل راهکارهای ارتقاء هر کدام از الگوهای شخصیتی تعریف شده در الگوها در ادامه مباحث وی بیان گردیده و نهایتاً مباحث ارزشمند تفکیک شخصیت افراد در الگوی چپ مغزی، راستی مغزی و یا کارآفرین تحلیل می گردد. همانگونه که مستحضرید با استفاده از آزمون های تخصصی و سنجش الگوهای رفتاری کارکرد مغزی افراد میتوان اشخاص متعدد را در قالب قدرت نسبی بخش راست و یا چپ مغزی وی بصورت نسبی دسته بندی نمود. خاطر نشان می گردد این مباحث و تست های عملکردی نسبی مغز، نه تنها علمی تحلیلی بوده، بلکه در آزمون مصاحبه دکتری تخصصی علوم رفتاری و بویژه رشته های متنوع روانشناسی، مورد توجه اساسی مصاحبه کنندگان تخصصی میباشند.

 

Subject: "Analyze of intelligence (IQ, EQ or SQ) and classify different personalities"

 

Dr. Ali Mohammadipour

 

 

Introducing

A good indicator of success in the past has been the level of one's intelligence. It was assumed that the relationship between one's IQ and one's success would be positively correlated.

However, what about "book smarts vs. street smarts?

" Can an individual with an average IQ be more successful than an IQ genius?

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." - Charles Darwin

IQ will get you through school, but EQ gets you through life.

 

IQ – Intelligence Quotient

A number that signifies the relative intelligence of a person; the ratio multiplied by 100 of the mental age as reported on a standardized test to the chronological age.

IQ is primarily used to measure one's cognitive abilities, such as the ability to learn or understand new situations; how to reason through a given problem/scenario; the ability to apply knowledge to one's current situations.

Over 140 - Genius or almost genius

120 - 140 - Very superior intelligence (Gifted)

110 - 119 - Superior intelligence

90 - 109 - Average or normal intelligence

80 - 89 - Dullness

70 - 79 - Borderline deficiency in intelligence

Under 70 - Feeble-mindedness

                                                                                                                                          

EQ – Emotional Quotient

In mid-1990s, Daniel Goleman revealed findings in neuroscience and psychology that stressed the importance of Emotional Quotient (EQ).

Emotional intelligence (EI) is an ability, skill or, in the case of the trait EI model, a self-perceived ability to identify, assess, and control the emotions of oneself, of others, and of groups. Various models and definitions have been proposed of which the ability and trait EI models are the most widely accepted in the scientific literature.

Criticisms have centered on whether the construct is a real intelligence and whether it has incremental validity over IQ and the Big Five personality dimensions

Examples by comparison of EQ vs. IQ:

-Appealing to emotions to convince someone rather than using facts alone

 -Using your emotions in addition to your cognitive abilities to function rather than relying solely on logic

-Knowing how and why vs. Knowing what

-Knowing how to motivate separate individuals as opposed to treating everyone the same way

-Understanding and controlling your emotions to use them for something vs. Letting your emotions control you because you do not know how to deal with them.

 

The Components of EQ

Emotional intelligence is measured using 5-major components and 15-subcomponents:

1. Intrapersonal Skills (ability to understand and apply personal emotions)

* Self Regard (ability to accept oneself as basically good)

* Emotional Self Awareness (ability to recognize one's own feelings, which allows us to manage them and make better decisions. It is important to be positive even when challenged because it results in more focused thinking)

* Assertiveness (ability to express feelings, beliefs, and thoughts without becoming antagonistic and uncooperative towards others)

* Independence (ability to be self-directed and self-controlled in ones thinking and actions and to be free of emotional dependency)

* Self Actualization (ability to realizes one's potential)

2. Interpersonal Skills (people skills)

* Empathy (understanding the feelings of others, which enables us to respond appropriately to changes in the emotional climate of others; Significant others, take note)

* Social Responsibility (being a cooperative, contributing, and constructive member of various social groups)

* Interpersonal Relationships (ability to establish and maintain mutually beneficial relationships noted for their intimacy and by the giving & receiving of affection, whether it be as a lover, friend, family member, or loyal employee)

3. Stress Management (ability to handle challenges)

* Stress Tolerance (Ability to handle difficult situations without ‘falling apart')

* Impulse Control (ability to resist or delay an impulse, drive, or temptation to act; controlling the need for "instant gratification")

An Impulse is a sudden desire to do something  

4. Adaptability (Ability to react quickly, appropriately, and efficiently to change)

* Reality Testing (ability to assess the correspondence between what is experienced and what objectively exists; knowing what you want to do vs. what you actually can do)

* Flexibility (ability to adjust one's emotions, thoughts, and behaviors to changing situations and conditions)

* Problem Solving (ability to identify and define problems as well as to generate and implement potentially effective solutions)

5. General Mood 

* Optimism

* Happiness

Right vs. Left Brain in Education System

This theory of the structure and functions of the mind suggests that the two different sides of the brain control two different modes” of thinking. It also suggests that each of us prefers one mode over the other.

Discussion

Experimentation has shown that the two different sides, or hemispheres, of the brain are responsible for different manners of thinking. The following table illustrates the differences between left-brain and right-brain thinking:

Right Brain

 

Left Brain

Random Intuitive

Holistic Synthesizing

Subjective

Looks at wholes

Logical Sequential Rational

 Analytical

Objective

Looks at parts

Most individuals have a distinct preference for one of these styles of thinking. Some, however, are more whole-brained and equally adept at both modes.

Left-brain scholastic subjects focus on logical thinking, analysis, and accuracy. Right-brained subjects, on the other hand, focus on aesthetics, feeling, and creativity.

Learning Styles, Culture & Hemispheric Dominance

A. Hilliard describes "learning style". An important factor in understanding learning styles is understanding brain functioning. Both sides of the brain can reason, but by different strategies. and one side may be dominant.

A successive processor (left brain) prefers to learn in a step-by-step sequential format, beginning with details leading to a conceptual understanding of a skill. A simultaneous processor ( right brain) prefers to learn beginning with the general concept and then going on to specifics.

Which Type of Learner Are You ?

RIGHT (Global)

LEFT (Analytic)

Simultaneous Hemispheric Style

Successive Hemispheric Style

1. Visual

1. Verbal

2. Responds to tone of voice

2. Responds to word meaning

3. Random

3. Sequential

4. Processes information in varied order

4. Processes information linearly

5. Responds to emotion

5. Responds to logic

6. Impulsive

6. Plans ahead

7. Recalls people's faces

7. Recalls people's names

8. Gestures when speaking

8. Speaks with few gestures

9. Less punctual

9. Punctual

10. Prefers sound/music background while studying

10. Prefers formal study design

11. Prefers frequent mobility while studying

11. Prefers bright lights while studying

 

Right vs. Left Brain as a Conclusion

RIGHT Side of Brain

LEFT Side of Brain

Focus of modes, voice &  illustrations

Focus of meaning & mathematical mode  

Emotions & Affections 

Demonstrational & Logical

Analyze the relationship between yalda night and savior: From History to Scientific Inference

Analytical modeling of the role of insight on equilibrium actions using the scientific and theosophical approach

Philosophic discussion of rat racer concept with emphasis on determination and planning as a tools of success

to ,the ,and ,of ,a ,intelligence ,ability to ,one s ,of the ,the path ,intelligence this ,classify different personalities

مشخصات

تبلیغات

آخرین ارسال ها

برترین جستجو ها

آخرین جستجو ها